Friday, December 7, 2018

A December (!) cold-core tornado outbreak in Illinois: 12/1/18

Last Saturday's 28 tornadoes in Illinois (IL) were an unusual event so far north in December. I've had several requests to write about it, particularly because it was associated with a cold-core midlevel low (see this 2006 paper, and this one from 2004).  Here's a diagram showing a common "cold-core" type setting that can produce tornadoes:

As is typical in such settings, the storms on 12/1/18 were low-topped and photogenic, as were the tornadoes.  The images at the top of this post by Jed Christoph show the low-topped supercell near sunset that produced an EF3 tornado at Taylorville IL (22 injuries) at dark.  And below are tornadoes near Beardstown and Havana IL, respectively, from an earlier supercell in west-central IL.  In the first image below, notice the surrounding "blue-sky" appearance so common in cold-core type tornado situations. 
The tornadoes came primarily from these two long-track supercells beginning at mid-afternoon (see satellite photo below, and warning summary graphic from NWS Lincoln IL), and lasted into early evening after dark.  Thankfully, there were no deaths due to excellent warnings and generally good visibility.

Here's the 2100 UTC (3 pm CST) surface analysis around the time tornadoes began over west-central IL:

I've been asked why this outbreak wasn't better forecast.  Actually, SPC did have a well-placed 5% probability of tornadoes over west-central and central IL on their Day 1 outlooks during 12/1/18.  But tornado events featuring strong tornadoes associated with midlevel cold-core lows are, quite frankly, notoriously hard to pick out (see also 7/19/18 in Iowa).

A significant issue is usually instability (CAPE) that appears less robust with a narrower axis than most strong tornado settings we're used to seeing in the Plains.  Because of colder air aloft associated with midlevel lows, what appears to be relatively weak total CAPE can be misleading, with the relevant CAPE usually located closer to the ground in cold-core scenarios. This can set the stage for increased tilting and stretching of vorticity as air in storm updrafts accelerates upward.

Forecast models on December 1 actually did a good job of placing synoptic features and convective precipitation (below).  The 0-1 km energy-helicity index (EHI) combining CAPE and low-level shear often doesn't work well in cold-core tornado settings due to the smaller total CAPE values.  However, in this case, the morning RAP forecast graphics for mid-afternoon on 12/1/18 did suggest that sizable 0-1 km EHI values would be co-located with storms over west-central and central Illinois:

The midlevel low in this case was located farther west than in most cold-core tornado events, 350 to 400 miles west of the surface warm sector and boundary intersection, instead of within 200-250 miles.  But because the low was embedded within a large upper long wave trough in December (see the NAM 700 mb forecast below, first panel), cold air aloft in midlevels had spread far to the east over most of Illinois (note the blue-dotted freezing line in the same NAM forecast panel):

With 50's F surface dew points in the surface warm sector over Illinois beneath the cold air aloft (see surface map earlier), total CAPE values of 1000-1200 J/kg were forecast over Illinois (see second panel above).  This is is pretty decent instability for a cold-core type event, certainly larger than the 200-500 J/kg found in many cold-core settings.

As mentioned earlier, low-level CAPE (in roughly the lowest 3 km above ground) appears to be a significant factor in stronger cold-core events, enhancing low-level stretching.  Typical 0-3 km MLCAPE associated with tornado events is on the order of 50-75 J/kg.  But on 12/1/18, an axis of 0-3 km MLCAPE values near 200 J/kg (see below) was evident over western and central IL on the SPC mesoanalysis at mid and late afternoon, co-located with ongoing convective storms.  Sizable low-level shear (0-1 km storm-relative helicity/SRH of 200-400 m2/s2) was also present:

Such large low-level CAPE isn't directly evident when examining just total CAPE values, and when combined with sizable low-level shear, it can result in strong tilting and stretching of horizontal vorticity in storm updrafts.

I've been experimenting with a version of EHI (0-1 km "enhanced" EHI) that incorporates low-level CAPE to boost the parameter values in situations where large 0-3 km CAPE is present.  Below are both the effective signifcant tornado parameter (STP) fields and enhanced EHI fields for 2100 UTC and 2300 UTC (mid to late afternoon) from the SPC mesoanalysis on 12/1/18.  Note how the enhanced EHI values (EEHI) were larger due to the incorporation of the low-level CAPE in this "cold-core" scenario:

The RAP model 1-hour forecast sounding at Taylorville IL (TAZ) shortly before the EF-3 tornado confirmed the presence of large low-level CAPE (near 200 J/kg), along with large low-level shear (0-1 km SRH around 375 m2/s/):

It's interesting to note that the low-level hodograph on this profile through 3 km above ground looks like an almost "perfect" half circle.  That's very optimal shear available for tilting and stretching into an updraft boosted by large low-level CAPE and upward acceleration in the lowest 3 km.  Having > 60 kts of deep-layer (0-6 km) shear in the environment also helped to organize and strengthen the Taylorville storm's updraft.

Here's an image of the wedge-like Taylorville tornado when it was well southwest of the town before dark:

And here's the tornado moving through Taylorville, at dark, illuminated by power flashes:

Some final thoughts to wrap up here... First, in addition to the seasonal lateness, number/intensity of tornadoes, and westward distance of the midlevel low,  this cold-core event was also somewhat unusual in that the bulk of the tornadoes (particularly the Taylorville storm) occurred well within the warm sector south of the warm front, instead of close to the boundary intersection of the Pacific cool front/dryline and warm front.  That seems to be because low-level shear was strong deep into the warm sector and co-located with large warm sector low-level CAPE.  Cold-core setups in the warm season often lack low-level wind shear except near the warm front and boundary intersection, but that certainly wasn't the case here with this cool season event.

And lastly, this event, along with the 7/19/18 cold core tornado event in Iowa this year, makes me wonder if model forecast graphics of 0-3 km CAPE (not found on commonly-used model forecast web sites apart from the SPC mesoanalysis) should be more available for web users.  An incorporation of low-level CAPE into composite tornado parameters might also help in picking out these stronger cold-core type tornado outbreaks.  

In any event (pun intended), this was certainly a fascinating case for the first day of December.

- Jon Davies  12/7/18  


Unknown said...

Seems like supercell composite and EHI are things that are overlooked many times. The poorly forecast Pa, NY and Ohio outbreak on October 2 2018 also had relatively high supercell composite and EHI (particulary 0-3km).

Jon Davies said...

Hi John:

The EHI has been around a long time, and is a reasonable "ball park" way to assess areas where both CAPE and low-level shear appear to combine for possible support of supercell tornadoes. It's not a "magic" parameter by any means, and doesn't address potential limiting factors like weak 0-6 km deep layer shear. high LCL heights, and large near-ground CIN. But I think it is still useful in pointing to areas that probably need to be examined more closely for possible tornado potential. As you pointed out, on Oct 2nd this year the EHI parameter did a pretty good job highlighting the PA area from midday on where most of the stronger tornadoes occurred.

Thanks for your comment!

mazhar said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Trey Greenwood said...

Hi Jon,

Excellent write-up, as always! I completely agree with your thoughts on 0-3 CAPE being more readily available to web users since it seems to be a critical ingredient in these cold-core/cool season-type events.

I was wondering what your thoughts are on the "veer-back-veer" debate? If I recall correctly, most of the model soundings, as well as the observed soundings from the region (e.g. ILX), for this event showed substantial veer-back-veer wind profiles, yet VBV is commonly thought of as an inhibitor to tornadic supercell development. VBV seemed to play a role (along with other factors) in hampering the supercell/tornado threat in central/southern Oklahoma the previous day yet seemed to have no effect on the Illinois environment on 12-1. I was wondering if there are any certain thresholds or indicators of when VBV will have an adverse effect on a severe weather environment versus no effect at all?

Thanks for listening, and, again, excellent write-up!

Trey Greenwood

trendinseo said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dale Morris said...

Yahoo Mail Customer Service
Sbcglobal Support Phone Number
Mozilla firefox toll free number
Canon online support